🎊 Canon Rf 24 105 F4 Vs Ef 24 70 F2 8

1. cornyevo. • 3 yr. ago. The RF24-70 is a BETTER lens in almost every way. You will get a better image, specially for portrait style photography which is a must. The 24-105 will do a decent job but the 24-70 is a league above it. You're comparing a the 24-105 to a lens that is more than double the price of it. The (RF/EF) 24-70mm F2.8L is the workhorse for professional photographers. Great lens, but also pricier than the 24-105mm F4L. Here in Europe around €800-900 difference. The latter is a great travel lens, smaller and lighter. Which is also used a lot by professional photographers. ，十倍差价 佳能rf24-105 2.8 vs 佳能ef24-105 f4 腾龙28-105 f2.8，哪支rf套机镜头更适合你？ RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM 对比 RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM！ 首页 Walk around 24-105 rf is way better than the one it replaces and demonstrably better. I also have the 35mm rf which is the new nifty fifty, light and efficient, macros or whatever. 50mm 1.2 rf, my RF 24-70 f2.8 compared to RF 24-105 f4. Jan 28, 2020. Hi All, Going on a year of ownership with my EOS R and it's hands down the most satisfied I've been since getting into this hobby. I've been very happy with the RF 24-105 I purchased in the kit, and have since added the RF 50mm 1.2 which has pretty much lived on the camera the past 4 months. 3. RF 24-105mm f4 L IS USM. The RF 50mm f1.2 and RF 85mm f1.2 would do the heavy lifting, while the RF 24-105mm f4 would give me some flexibility with focal length when necessary. Alternatively, I could remove the RF 24-105mm f4 (and perhaps the RF 50mm f1.2), and replace it with the RF 28-70mm f2 USM L. At 24mm, the RF 24-105 F2.8 appears sharper than the RF 24-70 F2.8 in the center and midframe. The corner comparison shows the two lenses performing mostly similarly. At the long end, the two lenses perform similarly. The 24-105 has a slight advantage in the center, and the 24-70 has a slight advantage in the corner. As it happens, my Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 requires a +9 AFMA on both of my 7Ds. From my experience, AFMA would have been the first thing I'd have advised the OP to check. (That said, the really good "L" lenses do seem to leave the factory better adjusted than the lesser lenses do. And the 24-70 f/2.8 II had better be a really good lens, at that price!) Everybody I have spoke to has said, the best lens to get is a Canon 24-70 II F2.8 as the best all round lens. However I have always thought I have quite a shaky hand, so started to consider the Canon 24-105 F4 II IS as this comes with the IS. Although reviews still seem to pit the 24-70 II higher! The new RF 24-70 f/2.8L IS lens, as the last two let­ters of the mod­el name reveal, has a built-in opti­cal image sta­bi­liz­er, as does the RF 24-105 f/4L IS I test­ed here. On the oth­er hand, the EF ver­sion of the 24-70 f/2.8L II that I test­ed here does not fea­ture a built-in opti­cal image sta­bi­liz­er. Less DoF at F2.8 vs F4.0 but this is obvious. The lens will retail at over twice the price of the F4 lens. And I expect the optics to be far far better also. It will also be twice the size and weight too. You dont buy an F2.8 zoom just to take slightly better low light photos. 24-70/4 at B&H = $1,198. $1,198 x 2 = $2,396. 24-70/2.8 at B&H I do agree with your logic on the F4 vs. F2.8. That is a big step up in price to just capture family moments. The EF F2.8 is a price alternative, however it is larger and heavier. For casual shots (travel, family, etc.) I find myself with an F4 trinity (14-35, 24-105, 70-200) more often than its F2.8 equivalent. zQuv.

canon rf 24 105 f4 vs ef 24 70 f2 8